Home | Copyright | Is a Copyright Small Claims Court Finally In the Works?

Is a Copyright Small Claims Court Finally In the Works?

Attorney's Fees

Last week, Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) and Rep. Tom Marino (R-PA) introduced the Copyright Alternative in Small-Claims Enforcement Act of 2016 (the “CASE Act”), which would create what amounts to a small claims court within the Copyright Office. The bill comes on the heels of a big push by advocacy organizations representing the interests of individual creators such as the American Society of Media Photographers and the Professional Photographers of America, to develop such legislation to give independent rights owners a meaningful opportunity to enforce their copyright interests.

As Nicole Martinez recently wrote in her article on Winning Attorney’s Fees last week, bringing litigation against an infringer is a costly undertaking, and in many cases, the likely recovery pales in comparison to the cost of bringing suit. Moreover, litigation is painfully slow, and it can often take years before cases are finally resolved. The result is that many independent rights holders effectively have no mechanism to enforce their rights. Takedown notices under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) are of limited effectiveness, and since infringers know that the likelihood of being taken to court is slim, they’ll continue to infringe with impunity, even in the face of a cease-and-desist letter. To help ease the pain, creatives have been clamoring for an alternative dispute resolution mechanism – something that would let them have their day in court, but would be faster and cheaper for both sides.

A Copyright Small Claims Court is Not a New Idea

In 2006 Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) held a hearing on the need for new remedies to address small claims which resulted in a 2011 request (nothing moves quickly in Congress) that the Copyright Office undertake a comprehensive study on the issue and report back to Congress. In 2013 the Copyright Office submitted its aptly-titled Copyright Small Claims report in which it evaluated a number of possible options for handling small claims. The report concluded that the most effective approach would be to set up a tribunal within the Copyright Office to hear such claims, and it offered Congress a roadmap for possible legislation.

Most recently, a coalition of visual arts advocacy groups issued a white paper calling for the creation of a small claims tribunal.  At long last, Congress listened.

How Would a Copyright Small Claims Court work?

The CASE Act more or less tracks the proposal set forth by the Copyright Office, creating a Copyright Claims Board within the Copyright Office staffed by three full-time claims officers to serve as “judges,” each of whom would be required to have substantial experience in copyright matters. Participation in the small claims system would be voluntary, meaning that if a defendant received a claim through the Copyright Claims Board, he or she could opt out, essentially forcing the copyright owner to bring suit in federal court to enforce his or her rights. The reason the system can’t be mandatory is a bit complicated, but it comes from the Constitution. If you’re interested in learning more on that point, the Copyright Office study on small claims solutions, mentioned above, discusses these issues at length.

Statutory Damages

So let’s pause here for a moment. Many independent rights owners start to question the efficacy of a small claims solution if it’s voluntary. Wouldn’t every would-be defendant just opt out, forcing the rights owner to bring full-fledged litigation (which, for reasons discussed previously, is usually untenable)?

It’s certainly possible, but unlikely. The bill includes some incentives for defendants, too. As in traditional federal court copyright litigation, the Copyright Claims Board would have the authority to grant actual damages and lost profits associated with an infringement, as well as statutory damages in certain circumstances. Except unlike federal court, where statutory damage awards can reach up to $150,000 per work infringed, the Copyright Claims Board’s damages awards would be limited to $15,000 per work infringed for works registered before infringement or within three months of publication and $7,500 per work for those that were not timely registered. The total recovery in any one proceeding would be limited to $30,000.

While some defendants may still decline to participate, it’s likely that many, especially those with weak defenses, will welcome the opportunity to avoid the high costs and significant risk associated with federal litigation.

There are some other significant limitations which may influence the parties’ willingness to participate. In addition to money damages, federal courts are empowered to issue injunctions – court orders that require an infringer to stop the infringing behavior, destroy infringing copies, and similar remedies. The Copyright Claims Board would not be able to issue that kind of order, but it could issue orders that reflect a defendant’s voluntary agreement to cease the infringing conduct, and take that agreement into account when the Board determines the money damages award.

Attorney’s Fees

Another limitation relates to attorneys’ fees. As Nicole Martinez discusses in her recent Art Law Journal article, the Copyright Act allows judges to compel the losing side to pay some or all of the prevailing party’s legal fees, which further enhances the risk associated with federal litigation. The CASE Act expressly provides that in the context of a Copyright Claims Board proceeding, the parties bear their own costs.

At first glance, having to bear your own costs seems like it might make the prospect of litigation more expensive, rather than cheaper, but because the copyright small claims process doesn’t require a lawyer, the costs associated with a proceeding will almost certainly be lower. Strictly speaking, you could represent yourself in federal court as well, but the procedural aspects of federal litigation are so complex that it would be ill-advised. The procedures of the Copyright Claims Board have been developed so that while you can have a lawyer represent you, you don’t need one. Interestingly, the bill also includes a provision that would expressly permit qualified law students to represent clients before the Board – this type of framework is common in many state court systems but is rarely seen in federal agencies.

Copyright Small Claims Should Be Faster and Easier

Copyright Claims Board proceedings are intended to be similar to, but much more efficient than, federal court litigation. While there are the same basic steps involved – filing a complaint, serving notice on the defendant, possible counterclaims, scheduling, discovery (the process by which each side learns more about the other’s case and associated evidence), hearings, and the rendering of a decision by the Board – the entire process would take place without the need for in-person appearances. Everything would be handled “by means of written submissions and hearings and conferences accomplished via internet-based applications or other telecommunications facilities,” which is an oh-so-congressional way of saying “by phone or on the Internet.”

Beyond lowering the cost of pursuing enforcement actions, one of the primary benefits of the small claims procedure is speed.  Because the system doesn’t exist yet, it’s impossible to say how quickly the Copyright Claims Board would be able to move through its docket, since it will necessarily depend on the volume of cases, and the nature of the work before it which is difficult to predict in the abstract. But it seems reasonable to assume that while federal court litigation typically requires something on the order of years, the Copyright Claims Board would be able to close cases on the order of months.


The CASE Act represents an important step forward for independent rights owners, and while the proposal is not without its critics, the bill has garnered widespread support among major copyright stakeholders. Rep. Judy Chu (D-CA) is rumored to be working on her version of a small claims bill which we may see some time after the August recess.

To be sure, there is a long, windy road ahead for the CASE Act or whatever other legislation may emerge on this issue in the months and years ahead. Still, the small claims issue has received more attention – and developed more concrete results in Congress – during the past several months than it has in the past several decades, giving hope that help for small, independent rights owners is on the way.


About the author

Chris Reed

Chris Reed is a Los Angeles-based photographer and lawyer. He practices copyright law in the  media and entertainment industries and is the author of Copyright Workflow for Photographers: Protecting, Managing, and Sharing Digital Images from Peachpit Press.


Click here to post a comment

  • Hi!

    Thanks for the helpful info on this website!

    I was wondering if the Mickey Mouse icing decorations that you are available online and in Michaels stores/party stores can be used on cookies/cupcakes and sold to customers? Or is it a copyright violation?


    Since I am not making the Mickey Mouse Disney character myself, does it still violate the Disney copyright? I would like to buy these in bulk, since I have a lot of customer demand, but don’t want to violate copyright.

    Please let me know! Look forward to hearing from you! Thank you! Ashley

  • Thanks for this helpful rundown. Just FYI – you’ve linked to the wrong CASE Act. The Legislation you’ve linked to is the Clean Air, Strong Economies Act.

  • I definitely think we are headed toward helpful law Small Claims Copyright especially for the vast majority of photographers, but it certainly won’t happen in the current session of Congress which won’t be doing much from now until after the election, and then they are lame duck and likely won’t be doing much of anything. The currently introduced bill, and any others will need to be reintroduced in the next Congress and the process started all over again. Hopefully with some pushing that will happen before spring next year.

The Latest From Artrepreneur

  • Immigrant Artist Jan Sawka, Global Icon

    Jan Sawka is an immigrant artist who migrated to the United States from Poland in the 1970s. Here Hanna Sawka discusses her father's work.The post Immigrant Artist Jan Sawka, Global Icon appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • Artist Bang Geul Han on Feminist Art

    Artist Bang Geul Han discusses Electronic Integrated Art, major influences and the trouble with being an interdisciplinary artist.The post Artist Bang Geul Han on Feminist Art appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • An Interview with Debi Cornwall

    Photographer Debi Cornwall talks about being a civil rights attorney, CFEVA, and how she got started with photography.The post An Interview with Debi Cornwall appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • We’re Still Feeling These Three Clio-Winning Ad Campaigns

    In preparation for the 2018 Clio Awards, we take a look back at the winning ad campaigns of the last three years and what made them so successful.The post We’re Still Feeling These Three Clio-Winning Ad Campaigns appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • How Artists Have Responded to the Me Too Movement

    The Me Too movement has had profound effects across all forms of media and has inspired countless male and female artists.The post How Artists Have Responded to the Me Too Movement appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • An Interview With Syd Carpenter

    Sculptor Syd Carpenter on working as an ornamental gardener, Fellowship programs and the challenges of being a Philadelphia artist.The post An Interview With Syd Carpenter appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • Mastering Your Pitch Presentation

    Your best ideas are only as good as how well you can sell them, and mastering the art of the pitch presentation takes time, research, and devotion.The post Mastering Your Pitch Presentation appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • How to Land Top Freelance Gigs

    From cementing your personal branding to building a digital portfolio highlighting your best work, here's how you land the top freelance gigs available.The post How to Land Top Freelance Gigs appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • Bill Carroll: Career Advice from the Artist, Professor & EFA Studios Director

    Pratt Institute professor and EFA director Bill Carroll talks about his career trajectory, lessons from the art market, and the fundamental shifts he's made in the pursuit of his art.The post Bill Carroll: Career Advice from the Artist, Professor […]

  • Develop an Art Catalog, Sell More Work

    From keeping an art archive to keep your studio organized to developing a sleek art catalog for sales, artists should incorporate an organizational routine if they're looking to grow their business.The post Develop an Art Catalog, Sell More Work […]

  • How to Create the Perfect Pitch Deck

    When preparing to present your services to a potential client, what should go into your pitch deck? From services offered to payment schedules, here's how to create a deck that lands the gig.The post How to Create the Perfect Pitch Deck appeared […]

  • How Museum Hotels Like 21c Serve Art to Their Local Communities

    Museum hotels like 21c are finding new ways to engage with their local art communities. Here's how artists can work collaboratively with this innovative new concept.The post How Museum Hotels Like 21c Serve Art to Their Local Communities appeared […]

  • How to Host a Meetup for Local Artists

    Organizing an art meetup is an excellent way to build community. We sit down with the founders of successful initiatives like the Portland Artist Network and the Rural America Contemporary Art Group.The post How to Host a Meetup for Local Artists […]

  • AR as Visual Narrative: In Conversation with Todd Berreth

    NC State University professor Todd Berreth discusses his evolution as an artist and technologist, with a focus on exploring visual narrative within an AR framework.The post AR as Visual Narrative: In Conversation with Todd Berreth appeared first on […]

  • How This New Startup is Elevating AR Creatives

    As the prevalence of augmented reality technology continues to rise, more creatives look to incorporate it into their practice. Companies like Poplar are looking to support AR creatives.The post How This New Startup is Elevating AR Creatives […]

  • Ahol Sniffs Glue on Retail Partnerships and Never Selling Out

    Artist Ahol Sniffs Glue shares insights on managing your brand, taking on retail partnerships and embracing the hustle.The post Ahol Sniffs Glue on Retail Partnerships and Never Selling Out appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • What is Participatory Design in the Arts?

    Introducing principles of participatory design and participatory art into your work can create a more personal experience for your audience, while also promoting repeated viewings for new experiences.The post What is Participatory Design in the […]

  • Let’s Get Virtual! VR Innovations Bridge Fine Arts & Technology

    How is VR and AR affecting the fine arts sector? In a conversation with [email protected] radio, Grace Cho and Todd Berreth discuss emerging trends in VR art.The post Let’s Get Virtual! VR Innovations Bridge Fine Arts & Technology appeared first on […]

  • Mi-Kyoung Lee on Developing a Practice Far From Home

    Born in South Korea, Philadelphia-based artist Mi-Kyoung Lee weaves fiber and plastic to create ethereal sculptures that meditate on labor and domesticity.The post Mi-Kyoung Lee on Developing a Practice Far From Home appeared first on Artrepreneur. […]

  • How an Artist and Musician Collab Can Help Double Your Audience

    From album cover art to costumes and set designs, pairing an artist and musician for an ongoing collaboration is a wonderful way to expand both their networks.The post How an Artist and Musician Collab Can Help Double Your Audience appeared first on […]